Go back to homepageWatch PubDef VideosAdvertise on PubDef.netA D French & Associates LLCContact Us
 

Watch PubDef.TV


"Best Blogger"
St. Louis Magazine

Featured on
Meet the Press and Fox News

Watch our Meet the Press moment

"One of the Most
Influential People
in Local Media."

STL Business Journal


SUPPORT PUBDEF.NET

Your $7.00 monthly contribution will go a long way to helping us expand the coverage and services you enjoy.


GET THE LATEST PUBDEF NEWS 24/7:

Name:
E-mail:




ABOUT PUB DEF

PUB DEF is a non-partisan, independent political blog based in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Our goal is to cast a critical eye on lawmakers, their policies, and those that have influence upon them, and to educate our readers about legislation and the political processes that affect our daily lives.

CONTACT US

Do you have a press release, news tip or rumor to share?

editor@pubdef.net
Fax (314) 367-3429
Call (314) 779-9958

Tips are always 100% Confidential


Subscribe to our RSS feed

Creative Commons License


 

 

 

 

 

Quick Bits: Mo' Money, Mo' Money

By Antonio D. French

Filed Tuesday, September 11, 2007 at 2:55 PM

After first saying she wouldn't, U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill has bowed to the pressure and agreed to return contributions linked to Norman Hsu.

From the AP:
The Missouri Democrat said she made the decision over the weekend, as the cloud of suspicion has grown surrounding contributions from donors connected to Hsu.

McCaskill took no money directly from Hsu, but her staff has estimated that the senator received more than $18,000 from people reportedly associated with Hsu, including the family of William Paw of Daly City, Calif.

On Friday, McCaskill said she had no plans to return the money from Hsu-related donors because there was no evidence they had done anything wrong. But she pledged to give up any campaign money if it was discovered to be from illegal sources or from people accused of crimes.
Meanwhile, the Missouri Ethics Commission's got everybody saying "Huh?"

From the Post-Dispatch:
The Missouri Ethics Commission voted unanimously today to tell candidates who had collected campaign contributions larger than the now-restored donation limits that they "may be in violation" of state law.

However, the six-member panel stopped short of ordering candidates to return their over-limit contributions, which in some cases amount to millions of dollars.

Instead, the commission said it plans to hold hearings for each candidate who seeks to keep his or her over-limit money by contending that giving it back would constitute an unfair hardship.
"May be in violation"? "Unfair hardship"? "Hearings"?

Huh?

Labels:

Link to this story


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

PubDef.net is looking for cameramen.



The Royale Foods & Spirits

Visit the PUB DEF Store



Advertise on Pub Def

 

 

 

Google
 
Web www.pubdef.net