By Antonio D. French
Filed Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 10:34 AM
Labels: Schools
|
"Best Blogger" — St. Louis Magazine Featured on
"One of the Most SUPPORT PUBDEF.NET Your $7.00 monthly contribution will go a long way to helping us expand the coverage and services you enjoy. GET THE LATEST PUBDEF NEWS 24/7: ABOUT PUB DEF PUB DEF is a non-partisan, independent political blog based in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Our goal is to cast a critical eye on lawmakers, their policies, and those that have influence upon them, and to educate our readers about legislation and the political processes that affect our daily lives. CONTACT US Do you have a press release, news tip or rumor to share? editor@pubdef.net Tips are always 100% Confidential
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIDEO: Elected School Board Meets
|
|
|
9 Comments:
Where was Diana Bourisaw?
6/19/2007 11:45 AM
^At the real board meeting.
6/19/2007 11:47 AM
Bourisaw has given up on Purdy and company. She wants a paycheck.
6/19/2007 9:52 PM
So we know what she is about money and jobs just like the union. It looks like her true colors are coming out. She seems to only be in the way.
6/19/2007 11:32 PM
The legislation that created the transitional board indicates that it is scheduled to be DISSOLVED on July 1, 2008. This information is available on the transitional board's own website. www.sab-stl.com.
In July 2008, the state board of education must determine if they should seek to REESTABLISH the transitional board. This will require them to give notice to the governor and general assembly. If it is shown that its purpose has been accomplished, the dissolution stands, and the elected board could be returned to power as early as next summer--even without a lawsuit.
In light of all this, doesn't it make sense for the elected board to continue to meet and be involved in the process?
All those who are overly gleeful about the "takeover" should do their homework.
6/20/2007 8:34 AM
Were there cameras at the new board's meet and greet?
I was surprised to see no article posted.
6/20/2007 8:34 AM
How did the two anonymous posters at the top of this page make comments on 6/19 at 11:45 am and 11:47am?
The meetings had not happend till the evening?
ADF- Can you please put turn the anonymous posting off. Who ever is writing this stuff is a jerk.
6/20/2007 9:31 AM
Jason, I think the first commenter was noting that the superintendent was not at the 9:00 meeting of the elected board. The second commenter (who very well may be the same person as the first) seems to be making a joke. You are correct that the appointed board did not meet until later in the day.
I may very well turn off anonymous comments again if it is abused.
Thanks for reading. Don't let a few ignorant comments here and there turn you off to open discussions.
6/20/2007 10:42 AM
I enjoy a lot of the anonymous comments--------unless they are slandering someone in blatantly specific ways.
Most of them are just funny.
6/20/2007 12:02 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home