Go back to homepageWatch PubDef VideosAdvertise on PubDef.netA D French & Associates LLCContact Us
 

Watch PubDef.TV


"Best Blogger"
St. Louis Magazine

Featured on
Meet the Press and Fox News

Watch our Meet the Press moment

"One of the Most
Influential People
in Local Media."

STL Business Journal


SUPPORT PUBDEF.NET

Your $7.00 monthly contribution will go a long way to helping us expand the coverage and services you enjoy.


GET THE LATEST PUBDEF NEWS 24/7:

Name:
E-mail:




ABOUT PUB DEF

PUB DEF is a non-partisan, independent political blog based in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Our goal is to cast a critical eye on lawmakers, their policies, and those that have influence upon them, and to educate our readers about legislation and the political processes that affect our daily lives.

CONTACT US

Do you have a press release, news tip or rumor to share?

editor@pubdef.net
Fax (314) 367-3429
Call (314) 779-9958

Tips are always 100% Confidential


Subscribe to our RSS feed

Creative Commons License


 

 

 

 

 

Getting the whole story

By Dan Martin

Filed Monday, May 07, 2007 at 11:47 AM

Fired Up! Missouri brought to our attention today a story run by the Post-Dispatch. According to the story, "A poll released today by a Clayton research institute shows two-thirds of Missouri residents favor the controversial school choice legislation defeated earlier this year by the state House of Representatives."

The story goes on to explain that the survey "found that 67 percent of Missourians support the tax credit proposal."

The problem Fired Up! Missouri brought to our attention is that the Post-Dispatch story downplays the fact that the survey was conducted on behalf of the Show-Me Institute by Market Research Insight.

The Show-Me Institute itself is an advocacy organization that supported the defeated legislation, and Market Research Insight is a paid consultant of Governor Matt Blunt, for whom school vouchers are key re-election issue. The organizations are mentioned in the story, but there is little recognition of the fact that the survey results come from these possibly biased organizations.

Instead, these results are presented as objective, with several paragraphs intervening between the mention of the polling firm and the explanation of that firm's biases. Even then, only a single sentence is given over to mention of this potential bias.

Questions and/or accusations regarding motive aside, this is, at best, shoddy reporting.

Labels: ,

Link to this story


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

PubDef.net is looking for cameramen.



The Royale Foods & Spirits

Visit the PUB DEF Store



Advertise on Pub Def

 

 

 

Google
 
Web www.pubdef.net