Go back to homepageWatch PubDef VideosAdvertise on PubDef.netA D French & Associates LLCContact Us
 

Watch PubDef.TV


"Best Blogger"
St. Louis Magazine

Featured on
Meet the Press and Fox News

Watch our Meet the Press moment

"One of the Most
Influential People
in Local Media."

STL Business Journal


SUPPORT PUBDEF.NET

Your $7.00 monthly contribution will go a long way to helping us expand the coverage and services you enjoy.


GET THE LATEST PUBDEF NEWS 24/7:

Name:
E-mail:




ABOUT PUB DEF

PUB DEF is a non-partisan, independent political blog based in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Our goal is to cast a critical eye on lawmakers, their policies, and those that have influence upon them, and to educate our readers about legislation and the political processes that affect our daily lives.

CONTACT US

Do you have a press release, news tip or rumor to share?

editor@pubdef.net
Fax (314) 367-3429
Call (314) 779-9958

Tips are always 100% Confidential


Subscribe to our RSS feed

Creative Commons License


 

 

 

 

 

Lawyers Rate Local Judges

By Antonio D. French

Filed Wednesday, August 30, 2006 at 8:15 AM

In the November general election, Missouri voters will determine whether Non-Partisan judges whose names are on their ballot should be retained for another term. To help them decide, The Missouri Bar has provided information they feel is important in making those decisions.

Members of The Missouri Bar have evaluated each of the judges who will be standing for retention this fall and the evaluations are now online at www.showmecourts.org.

In St. Louis County, the Bar recommended two judges, Judy Preddy Draper and Brenda Stith Loftin, not be retained. Click here to see those recommendations.

Click here to download the Bar's recommendations for St. Louis City Circuit Judges. And click here for Associate Circuit Judges.

Labels:

Link to this story


3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The public has got to start paying attention to these results--most people I know say they either vote yes or no to all the judges, or randomly vote, depending on how they feel that day. This is too important and if even the lawyers, who don't want to say anything bad about fellow lawyers/judges, say there are problems then the public needs to consider that and vote responsibly.

8/30/2006 10:22 AM

 
Blogger Travis Reems said...

As the son of a lawyer, I'm not sure why voters would be interested in the opinion of members of the bar. It seems a bit like the foxes guarding the hen house. I'd be interested in the companion poll of jurors, or one of parties to the cases that were in front of these judges. Also, I'd like to know where the judges stand on various issues. All of that seems more helpful than a poll of MoBar members.

8/31/2006 10:27 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some truth to that Travis, although the "foxes," as you call them, don't seem to be helped much by protecting a hen house full of rotten hens. I bet your dad would tell you that he can think of judges who ruled in his favor on cases that were rude to parties or the lawyers or who weren't conversant with the law, and he didn't approve of them even if the case did go his way. I mean, when a judge is scoring as low as these bottom two did, the lawyers certainly aren't closing ranks around them.

As far as polling the parties, seems that would pretty much break down 50/50--winner likes the judge, loser doesn't. It might have the benefit of getting the public to pay attention to the fact that judges are elected, however, not appointed in some secret back room somewhere.

Polling the jurors is a good step, however.

9/02/2006 2:35 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

The 23rd Annual Wine and Roses Ball

PubDef.net is looking for cameramen.



The Royale Foods & Spirits

Visit the PUB DEF Store



Advertise on Pub Def

 

 

 

Google
 
Web www.pubdef.net